Skip to content

Conversation

@AmberAlston
Copy link
Member

Initial draft to add more info about Alpha and Beta phases plus an edit to GA def

Initial draft to add more info about Alpha and Beta phases plus an edit to GA def
@replicated-ci replicated-ci added type::docs Improvements or additions to documentation type::feature labels Oct 16, 2024
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for replicated-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 911fcc8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/replicated-docs/deploys/6711370ae29ede000869b339
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2747--replicated-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for replicated-docs-upgrade ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 911fcc8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/replicated-docs-upgrade/deploys/6711370a011c5f0008926188
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2747--replicated-docs-upgrade.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@crdant
Copy link
Member

crdant commented Oct 16, 2024

I'd like to more emphatically call out that "beta" does not imply "lower quality" if we are comfortable with that.

@AmberAlston
Copy link
Member Author

I'd like to more emphatically call out that "beta" does not imply "lower quality" if we are comfortable with that.

I'm open to that. Do you have a suggested edit @crdant ?

Copy link
Contributor

@paigecalvert paigecalvert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added some suggestions @AmberAlston !

@AmberAlston
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @paigecalvert!

I accepted and committed the 3rd suggestion. I agree a follow up explaining production readiness in more detail could be a good follow up iteration. I don't really want to try to explain "value-additive" meaning part of our definition of done in this limited content space. I think it's explanatory enough for now. We can reassess based on any feedback/

I answered your questions on the first two suggestions. I think some combination between your suggestions and my original will be the sweet spot. See what you think based on my question follow ups.

AmberAlston and others added 4 commits October 17, 2024 09:52
Added this line "Beta products or features follow the same build and test processes required for GA." based on @crdant's earlier suggestion
@AmberAlston AmberAlston marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 16:21
@AmberAlston AmberAlston requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2024 16:21
@AmberAlston AmberAlston merged commit e8bf924 into main Oct 17, 2024
5 checks passed
@AmberAlston AmberAlston deleted the AmberAlston-patch-1 branch October 17, 2024 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type::docs Improvements or additions to documentation type::feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants